Tap / click on image to see more RealViewsTM
$29.30
per pack of 25 belly bands
Custom Wedding Invitation Belly Bands Wraps Band
Wedding Collection
Qty:
Style
Portrait
+$3.90
Shop this collection
Custom Wedding Central StoreDesigned by Design Your Own
About Invitation Belly Bands
Sold by
About This Design
Custom Wedding Invitation Belly Bands Wraps Band
Custom Invitation Belly Bands 2" x 11.5", designed for 5" x 7" PORTRAIT orientated invitations. 25 belly bands per order. Printed on heavyweight (110 lb.) card stock with a matte finish. Adhesive strip with removable liner to easily wrap your invitation suite together.
Custom WEDDING Central - CREATE, MAKE, DESIGN Your Own CUSTOM WEDDING INVITATION BELLY BANDS (WRAPS)
from a fully CUSTOMIZABLE, PERSONALIZED design TEMPLATE BLANK.
Customer Reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars rating271 Total Reviews
271 Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars rating
5 out of 5 stars ratingBy J.15 January 2017 • Verified Purchase
Invitation Belly Bands (Portrait)
Zazzle Reviewer Program
loved this product! was very pleased with quality. great printing for words!
from zazzle.com (US)
5.0 out of 5 stars rating
5 out of 5 stars ratingBy Victoria N.10 October 2016 • Verified Purchase
Invitation Belly Bands (Portrait)
Zazzle Reviewer Program
Very nice paper and easy to secure. Clean and crisp. I used my logo and text. Both turn out terrific.
My image is a tuxedo napkin. I used my belly band to hold the bottom, together.
from zazzle.com (US)
Reviews for similar products
5.0 out of 5 stars rating
5 out of 5 stars ratingBy Jeanne P.20 February 2026 • Verified Purchase
Invitation Belly Bands (Portrait)
They came out great. I recommend getting the larger details cards for aesthetics. I did 2 different details cards. 1 for the group that was invited to the Rehearsal Dinner and Brunch and one for the wedding only guests. These are the smaller detail cards and it still looks great. But the ones that were a little bigger were just a little prettier.
from zazzle.com (US)
Tags
Other Info
Product ID: 256165484640155954
Posted on 26/04/2016, 2:46 AM
Rating: G
